The Global Minimum Corporate Tax Rate: Framework, Implications and Policy Recommendations

Authors

  • Jiayue Huang School of Economics and Management, Nanjing University of Science and Technology, Nanjing, China

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/pbzd5p24

Keywords:

Global Minimum Tax, OECD/G20, Pillar One, Pillar Two, Tax Competition, International Tax Governance, Fiscal Policy.

Abstract

The global minimum corporate tax marks a milestone in international tax reform under the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) / Group of Twenty (G20) Inclusive Framework. Pillar One reallocates profits to market jurisdictions, while Pillar Two introduces a 15% minimum effective tax rate for large multinational enterprises (MNEs). This paper compares the OECD framework with the United States (U.S.) Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA) and the Corporate Alternative Minimum Tax (CAMT), analyzing their impacts on capital neutrality and global tax coordination. Results show that the multilateral approach curbs harmful tax competition but raises compliance costs. For China, proactive participation in global rule-making and strengthening innovation-based competitiveness are key to safeguarding fiscal sovereignty and promoting fair global tax governance.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Johannesen, “The Global Minimum Tax,” Journal of Public Economics, vol. 212, p. 104709, 2022.

[2] Schjelderup and Stähler, “The Economics of the Global Minimum Tax,” International Tax and Public Finance, 2023.

[3] Beer and R. A. De Mooij, “Taxation and the Global Economy: The Role of International Tax Coordination,” Journal of International Economics, vol. 130, p. 103445, 2021.

[4] Tanzi, “Taxation and International Cooperation in a Globalized World,” Fiscal Studies, vol. 42, no. 4, pp. 801 – 828, 2021.

[5] K. A. Clausing, “Profit Shifting Before and After the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act,” National Tax Journal, vol. 73, no. 4, pp. 1233 – 1256, 2020.

[6] Tørsløv, Wier, and G. Zucman, “The Missing Profits of Nations,” Review of Economic Studies, vol. 89, no. 3, pp. 1229 – 1263, 2022.

[7] Zucman, “Tax Evasion on an Epic Scale,” Journal of Economic Perspectives, vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 121 – 148, 2014.

[8] Kleinbard, “The Corporate Alternative Minimum Tax and the New International Tax Order,” Tax Law Review, vol. 75, no. 3, pp. 417 – 460, 2022.

[9] Tanzi, “Taxation and International Cooperation in a Globalized World,” Fiscal Studies, vol. 42, no. 4, pp. 801 – 828, 2021.

[10] J. Wang and Y. Li, “China’s Role in Global Tax Governance under the OECD Framework,” China Economic Review, vol. 81, p. 102024, 2023.

Downloads

Published

27-12-2025

How to Cite

Huang, J. (2025). The Global Minimum Corporate Tax Rate: Framework, Implications and Policy Recommendations. Highlights in Business, Economics and Management, 65, 645-649. https://doi.org/10.54097/pbzd5p24