A Cross-country Study on the Effects of Cultural Tightness on Donation Request Compliance

Authors

  • Alex Hanyu Chen BASIS Independent Silicon Valley, San Jose, 95126, USA

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/a1y37r45

Keywords:

Charitable giving, CTL, Cross-country data.

Abstract

The world is becoming increasingly dependent on charities to solve inequality and poverty. Charitable giving is a social phenomenon heavily dependent on cultural factors. One such underexplored factor is cultural tightness/looseness (CTL), or the degree to which individuals within a society adhere to the social norm. Prior literature indicated that there may be greater extrinsic motivations for individuals in tighter cultures to comply with donation requests based on very limited data. To verify this hypothesis, we used data from [1] and the 2021 World Giving Index Report across 54 different nations. We then developed a model for the relationship between CTL and the donation request compliance rate in a cross-country study. The model was then adjusted with other factors such as GDP per capita, ethnic tensions, and internal conflicts to improve the accuracy. We find evidence that as the culture is looser, individuals are less willing to comply with donation requests, validating the initial hypothesis and expanding on the external validity of past literature. We reveal a critical link between culture and donor behavior, and we also provide a strong foundation for future research regarding cultural effects on donor behavior at the individual level.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Uz, I. (2014). The Index of Cultural Tightness and Looseness Among 68 Countries. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 46(3), 319–335. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022114563611. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022114563611

[2] Wright, K. (2001). Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 12(4), 399–416. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1013974700175. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013974700175

[3] Parsell, C., Clarke, A., & Perales, F. (2022). Poverty by Design: The Role of Charity and the Cultivated Ethical Citizen. Social Policy and Society, 21(4), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1474746421000312. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1474746421000312

[4] Sussex, J., Feng, Y., Mestre-Ferrandiz, J., Pistollato, M., Hafner, M., Burridge, P., & Grant, J. (2016). Quantifying the economic impact of government and charity funding of medical research on private research and development funding in the United Kingdom. BMC Medicine, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-016-0564-z. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-016-0564-z

[5] DellaVigna, S., List, J. A., & Malmendier, U. (2012). Testing for Altruism and Social Pressure in Charitable Giving. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 127(1), 1–56. https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjr050 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjr050

[6] Andreoni, J. (1990). Impure Altruism and Donations to Public Goods: A Theory of Warm-Glow Giving. The Economic Journal, 100(401), 464–477. https://doi.org/10.2307/2234133. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2234133

[7] Falk, A., & Fischbacher, U. (2006). A theory of reciprocity. Games and Economic Behavior, 54(2), 293–315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geb.2005.03.001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geb.2005.03.001

[8] Meer, J., & Rosen, H. (2008). The Impact of Athletic Performance on Alumni Giving: An Analysis of Micro Data. Library Union Catalog of Bavaria, Berlin and Brandenburg (B3Kat Repository). https://doi.org/10.3386/w13937. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3386/w13937

[9] Andreoni, J., & A. Abigail Payne. (2013). Charitable Giving. Handbook of Public Economics, 1–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-444-53759-1.00001-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-53759-1.00001-7

[10] Elster, A., & Gelfand, M. J. (2020). When guiding principles do not guide: The moderating effects of cultural tightness on value‐behavior links. Journal of Personality, 89(2). https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12584. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12584

[11] Ma, A., Savani, K., Liu, F., Tai, K., & Kay, A. C. (2023). The mutual constitution of culture and psyche: The bidirectional relationship between individuals’ perceived control and cultural tightness–looseness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 124(5), 901–916. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspa0000327. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/pspa0000327

[12] Stamkou, E., Dunham, R., Pelowski, M., Lin, Y., & Gelfand, M. J. (2024). When rule breaking in art falls flat: Cultural tightness deflates deviant artists’ impact. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 18(1), 14–30. https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000650. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000650

[13] Siemens, J. C., Raymond, M. A., Choi, Y., & Choi, J. (2020). The influence of message appeal, social norms and donation social context on charitable giving: investigating the role of cultural tightness-looseness. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 28(2), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1080/10696679.2020.1717968. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10696679.2020.1717968

[14] Fong, C. M., & Luttmer, E. F. P. (2009). What Determines Giving to Hurricane Katrina Victims? Experimental Evidence on Racial Group Loyalty. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 1(2), 64–87. https://doi.org/10.1257/app.1.2.64. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1257/app.1.2.64

[15] Andreoni, J., A. Abigail, Payne, Smith, J., & Karp, D. (2016). Diversity and donations: The effect of religious and ethnic diversity on charitable giving. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 128, 47–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2016.05.010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2016.05.010

[16] Meer, J., & Rosen, H. S. (2009). Altruism and the Child Cycle of Alumni Donations. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 1(1), 258–286. https://doi.org/10.1257/pol.1.1.258. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1257/pol.1.1.258

[17] Martinez, J. M., Stinson, J. L., Kang, M., & Jubenville, C. B. (2010). Intercollegiate Athletics and Institutional Fundraising: A Meta-Analysis. Sport Marketing Quarterly, 19(1), 36–47. https://doi.org/10.1177/106169341001900106. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/106169341001900106

[18] Charities Aid Foundation. (2021). CAF WORLD GIVING INDEX 2021 [Review of CAF WORLD GIVING INDEX 2021]. In CAF WORLD GIVING INDEX 2021 (p. 1-24). Charities Aid Foundation. https://www.cafonline.org/docs/default-source/about-us-research/cafworldgivingindex2021_report_web2_100621.pdf.

[19] Mandel, A., & Realo, A. (2015). Across-Time Change and Variation in Cultural Tightness-Looseness. PLOS ONE, 10(12), e0145213. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0145213. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0145213

[20] Heim, B., & Montenovo, L. (2022). Are Charitable Donations and Volunteering Substitutes or Complements? New Evidence from Recent Tax Changes. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4170753. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4170753

[21] World Bank. (5 C.E.). GDP, PPP (constant 2021 international $) [Review of GDP, PPP (constant 2021 international $)]. World Development Indicators. https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GDP.MKTP. PP.KD.

Downloads

Published

27-12-2025

How to Cite

Chen, A. H. (2025). A Cross-country Study on the Effects of Cultural Tightness on Donation Request Compliance. Highlights in Business, Economics and Management, 65, 782-789. https://doi.org/10.54097/a1y37r45