The Shaping Mechanism of Institutional Quality Differences on the Long-Term Economic Growth Path and Its Theoretical Explanation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54097/qnxwr404Keywords:
Institutional quality; Long-term economic growth; Path dependence; Technological innovation; Institutional complementarity.Abstract
This paper explores how the long-term economic growth paths of countries are shaped by differences in institutional quality and the underlying theoretical mechanisms, and constructs a comprehensive analytical framework for the impact of institutional quality on economic growth after reviewing relevant literature in institutional economics, new growth theory, and comparative institutional analysis. The research shows that many aspects such as property rights protection, transaction costs, technological innovation incentives, factor accumulation and allocation efficiency are the ways in which institutional quality affects the economic growth path, among which high-quality institutions can reduce uncertainty, provide reasonable incentive structures to promote the effective operation of markets, support innovation activities to achieve sustainable growth, On the contrary, low-quality institutions may lead to rent-seeking, misallocation of resources and thus fall into a growth trap. Further analysis reveals that institutional evolution is path-dependent and that both historical initial conditions and cultural factors act on the direction of institutional change, resulting in a diverse growth trajectory. This study presents a theory of institutional co-evolution from the perspectives of new institutional economics, endogenous growth theory, and comparative political economy, which explains the dynamic interaction between institutional bundles and economic performance, as well as the situation where differences in institutional quality affect innovation, human capital accumulation, and resource allocation efficiency, resulting in sustained development differences among countries. This theoretical framework opens up a new perspective for understanding long-term economic growth disparities and offers policy implications for institutional reform in developing countries.
Downloads
References
[1] Muhammad Kamran Bhatti, Shujin Zhu, Ali Hassan, Muhammad Ali Husnain, Aqsa Bilal Hussain. How do financial development and institutional quality influence greenhouse gases in the Next-11 economies? [J]. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications,2025,12(1): DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-025-05897-3
[2] Hayet KADDACHI, Naceur BENZINA. Testing the Effects of Economic Growth and Institutional Quality on Environmental Sustainability: New Insights from ARDL and MMQR Approaches[J]. Chinese Journal of Urban and Environmental Studies,2025,(prepublish): DOI: https://doi.org/10.1142/S2345748125500204
[3] Pratibha S.,Krishna Muniyoor. India’s Debt Dilemma: Youdaoplaceholder0 Threshold, Primary Surplus, and Institutional Quality[J]. Journal of Emerging Market Finance,2025,24(4): DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/09726527251345112
[4] Kemal erqisui. Income Inequality and Economic Complexity Nexus: The Moderating Roles of Institutional Quality and Globalization[J]. Studia Universitatis “Vasile Goldis” Arad – Economics The Series, 2025, 35 (4) : DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/sues-2025-0016
[5] Mwoya Byaro, Monica Timbuka. Greening the future: Do green growth and institutional quality affect environmental sustainability differently across countries' income levels? International evidence[J]. Innovation and Green Development,2025,4(4): DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.igd.2025.100276
[6] Doytch Nadia, Ashraf Ayesha. Do institutions impact differently inward greenfield FDI and cross-border M& amp; A sales? A study of five institutional quality indicators in developed and developing countries[J]. Journal of Financial Economic The Policy, 2023, (6) : DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4094047
[7] Mehmood Usman. Environmental degradation and financial development: do institutional quality and human capital make a difference in G11 nations? [J]. Environmental science and pollution research international,2022,29(25): DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-18825-8
[8] Ahmad Mahmood, Ahmed Zahoor, Majeed Abdul, Huang Bo. An environmental impact assessment of economic complexity and energy consumption: Does institutional quality make a difference? [J]. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 2021, 89 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2021.106603
[9] Duan Yuchen. Research on the Combination of long-term and Short-term Mechanisms of China's Economic Growth [D]. Northwest University, 2017.
[10] Feng Mengli. Research on China's High-Quality Economic Development and Innovation System [D]. Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, 2018.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Highlights in Business, Economics and Management

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.







