A Review of Research on the Relationship between Macroeconomic Variables and Stock Market Returns

Authors

  • Zhihao Liu School of Economics and Management, Nanjing University of Science and Technology, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China
  • Yuanhao Wang School of Economics and Management, Nanjing University of Science and Technology, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China
  • Jing Wu School of Economics and Management, Nanjing University of Science and Technology, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China
  • Kaier Chen School of Economics and Management, Nanjing University of Science and Technology, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/0nc9fa59

Keywords:

Macroeconomic variables, Stock market returns, Asset pricing models, VAR/SVAR, GARCH, Policy uncertainty.

Abstract

This paper provides a comprehensive review of research on the relationship between macroeconomic variables and stock market returns. Theoretical foundations such as the Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM), Arbitrage Pricing Theory (APT), and Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) models explain how macroeconomic factors influence asset pricing through risk premiums, factor exposures, and corporate cash flows. Foreign studies, which began earlier, have developed mature analytical frameworks ranging from linear regressions to dynamic and nonlinear models such as VAR/SVAR, GARCH, and copula functions. Their findings generally confirm stable and significant linkages between macroeconomic indicators and stock returns in mature markets. In contrast, domestic research emphasizes market inefficiency, policy intervention, and investor behavior, employing methods such as cointegration analysis, event studies, and semi-parametric models. Results often reveal weak or stage-specific correlations, reflecting incomplete transmission mechanisms. Overall, macroeconomic variables—including GDP, inflation, money supply, interest rates, and exchange rates—affect stock markets through multiple channels, but the strength and stability of these effects depend on institutional and structural contexts. Future research should incorporate high-frequency data, strengthen expectation and behavioral modeling, refine industry-level analysis, and expand cross-market comparisons to better capture the complex dynamics between macroeconomics and financial markets.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Chen Qiulu, Yu Xuyou. Application analysis of asset pricing model and macroeconomic multifactor model in China’s A-share market [J]. Journal of Fuyang Normal University (Natural Science Edition), 2025, 42 (3): 48-56. (in Chinese)

[2] Deng Chuang, Zhang Tian, Xu Man, et al. Dynamic study on the relationship between financial market risk and macroeconomic prosperity in China [J]. Southern Economy, 2018 (4): 1-19. (in Chinese)

[3] Sun Chentong, Dang Yin, Miao Ziqing. Study on the macroeconomic effects and predictive ability of China’s government bond yield curve [J]. Contemporary Finance & Economics, 2024 (3): 56-69. (in Chinese)

[4] Huang Hengjun, Gao Haiyan, Han Jun. A machine learning-based method for macroeconomic data fusion [J]. Statistical Research, 2022, 39 (5): 134-145. (in Chinese)

[5] Li Yang, Chen Xuejiao. Empirical analysis of the impact of China’s macroeconomy on stock returns [J]. Journal of Xi’an University of Finance and Economics, 2009, 22 (2): 50-53. (in Chinese)

[6] Cui Jie, Qin Fuyong, Liao Yi. Empirical analysis of the relationship between China’s stock market and macroeconomy [J]. Statistics & Decision, 2011 (8): 124-127. (in Chinese)

[7] Fang Yi, Chen Yuzhi, Wei Jian. Artificial intelligence and China’s stock market—Quantitative research on investment portfolio prediction based on machine learning [J]. Industrial Technology Economy, 2022, 41 (8): 83-91. (in Chinese)

[8] Li Bin, Tu Xueyong. Research on portfolio selection based on machine learning and asset characteristics [J]. Systems Engineering—Theory & Practice, 2024, 44 (1): 338-355. (in Chinese)

[9] Li Xingyi, Li Zhongfei, Li Qiqian, et al. Review of research on asset return prediction based on machine learning [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2025, 33 (1): 311-322. (in Chinese)

[10] Lin Yao. Research on stock return prediction in China based on machine learning—Taking CSI 300 stocks as an example [D]. Huazhong University of Science and Technology, 2022. (in Chinese)

[11] Zhang Peng, Dang Shili, Huang Meiyu. Mean-variance portfolio decision based on machine learning hyperparameter optimization [J]. Operations Research and Management Science, 2024, 33 (11): 197-203. (in Chinese)

[12] Liu Yang. Application of machine learning and artificial intelligence in macroeconomics [J]. Finance & Accounting, 2024 (3): 17-21. (in Chinese)

[13] Zhang Zhanyi. Research on stock market crash risk warning from the perspective of machine learning [D]. Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, 2024. (in Chinese)

[14] Huang Naijing, Yu Mingzhe. Research progress on the impact of machine learning on economics [J]. Economic Perspectives, 2018 (7): 115-129. (in Chinese)

[15] Chen Biaojin, Wang Feng. Macroeconomic indicators, technical indicators and government bond futures price prediction—An empirical test based on random forest machine learning [J]. Statistics & Information Forum, 2019, 34 (6): 29-35. (in Chinese)

[16] Wang Yunsheng, Yang Liu. Empirical study on the impact of macroeconomic statistical data release on China’s financial market [J]. Shanghai Finance, 2008 (7): 53-57. (in Chinese)

[17] Ge Yingfan. Macroeconomic uncertainty and stock excess returns: Evidence from China’s A-share market [J]. Journal of Guangdong University of Finance & Economics, 2024, 39 (2): 11-28. (in Chinese)

[18] Gu Peng. Macroeconomic shocks and stock returns—Analysis based on daily data [J]. Research on Financial and Economic Issues, 2014 (10): 65-71. (in Chinese)

[19] Jin Qiaoyi. The impact of macroeconomic fluctuations on stock market prices [J]. Ideological Front, 2010 (S2). (in Chinese)

[20] Jiang Fuwei, Ma Tian, Zhang Hongwei. High risk, low return? Explanation of dynamic CAPM model based on machine learning [J]. Journal of Management Science, 2021, 24 (1): 109-126. (in Chinese)

[21] Fama E F. Stock Returns, Real Activity, Inflation, and Money [J]. The American Economic Review, 1981, 71 (4): 545–565.

[22] Geske R, Roll R. The Fiscal and Monetary Linkage Between Stock Returns and Inflation [J]. The Journal of Finance, 1983, 38 (1): 1–33. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1983.tb03623.x

[23] Chen N F, Roll R, Ross S A. Economic Forces and the Stock Market [J]. The Journal of Business, 1986, 59 (3): 383–403. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/296344

[24] Fama E F. Stock Returns, Expected Returns, and Real Activity [J]. The Journal of Finance, 1990, 45 (4): 1089–1108. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1990.tb02428.x

[25] Campbell, J. Y., & Shiller, R. J. (1988). The Dividend-Price Ratio and Expectations of Future Dividends and Discount Factors. The Review of Financial Studies, 1 (3), 195–228. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/1.3.195

[26] James C, Koreisha S G, Partch M M. A VARMA Analysis of the Causal Relations Among Stock Returns, Real Output, and Nominal Interest Rates [J]. The Journal of Finance, 1985, 40 (5): 1375–1384. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1985.tb02389.x

[27] Sharpe, W. F. (1964). Capital Asset Prices: A Theory of Market Equilibrium under Conditions of Risk. The Journal of Finance, 19 (3), 425–442. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1964.tb02865.x

[28] Stephen A Ross, The arbitrage theory of capital asset pricing,Journal of Economic Theory, Volume 13, Issue 3,1976,Pages 341-360,ISSN 0022-0531. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-0531(76)90046-6

[29] Lintner, J. (1965). The Valuation of Risk Assets and the Selection of Risky Investments in Stock Portfolios and Capital Budgets. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 47 (1), 13–37. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1924119

Downloads

Published

27-12-2025

How to Cite

Liu, Z., Wang, Y., Wu , J., & Chen, K. (2025). A Review of Research on the Relationship between Macroeconomic Variables and Stock Market Returns. Highlights in Business, Economics and Management, 65, 856-865. https://doi.org/10.54097/0nc9fa59