Comparative Analysis of China-US Debt Structures: Physical Asset Backing, Financial Risks, and Policy Implications

Authors

  • Linna Liu School of Economics and Management, Nanjing University of Science and Technology, Nanjing, China

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/rhnhqg37

Keywords:

China-U.S. debt comparison, debt governance, implicit debt.

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic has led to a surge in global debt and intensified the trade-offs associated with sovereign debt accumulation. Based on data from the IMF, World Bank, IIF and other international institutions, this paper conducts a comparative analysis of the debt scale and structure between China and the United States. Unlike the U.S., where debt is primarily driven by consumption and financial activities, China’s debt is largely backed by physical assets in the secondary sector, such as infrastructure and engineering projects, which support long-term growth and returns. However, these urban investment debts have also increased fiscal pressure on local governments. To address these implicit liabilities, this paper proposes enhanced central government oversight and the strategic use of local state-owned enterprise assets. Furthermore, while monitoring the impact of global debt risks on financial and real economies, China should prioritize building a domestic circulation–oriented growth model and proactively manage its debt challenges.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Fitch Ratings. (2023). Rating Action Commentary. Fitch Downgrades the United States' Long-Term Ratings to 'AA+' from 'AAA'; Outlook Stable. London: Fitch Ratings.

[2] IMF. (2023). Global Debt Database: Nonfinancial corporate debt, loans and debt securities.

[3] IIF. (2024). Global Debt Monitor: Politics, olicy, and Debt Markets-What to Watch in 2024

[4] Levon Barseghyan & Marco Battaglini. (2016). Political economy of debt and growth. Journal of Monetary Economics. 36-51.

[5] Paul Armstrong‐Taylor. (2016). Dealing with China’s Debt. Debt and Distortion: Risks and Reforms in the Chinese Financial System.

[6] The World Bank. (2023). International Debt Report 2023. Washington, D.C. : World Bank Group.

[7] Wanqi Feng. (2024). The key sticking points in China's debt problem (in Chinese). Shu Lun Pan CPA Co., Ltd

[8] Xiaojing Zhang & Lei Liu. (2024). NIFD Seasonal Report: Macro Leverage Ratio (in Chinese), National Institution of Finance and Development.

Downloads

Published

27-12-2025

How to Cite

Liu, L. (2025). Comparative Analysis of China-US Debt Structures: Physical Asset Backing, Financial Risks, and Policy Implications . Highlights in Business, Economics and Management, 65, 900-907. https://doi.org/10.54097/rhnhqg37