Comparative Analysis of the Video Game Industry in China, Japan, and South Korea
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54097/8v1a4v54Keywords:
Comparative analysis; Gaming industry; China; Japan; South Korea; Market dynamics; Cultural influence.Abstract
This study provides a comparative analysis of the gaming industries in China, Japan, and South Korea, exploring their market dynamics, core segments, industrial ecosystems, and cultural influences. China's gaming market is distinguished by its immense scale, mobile dominance, and a duopolistic structure led by Tencent and NetEase, with sophisticated digital distribution and aggressive monetization strategies. Japan excels in narrative depth and artistic innovation, maintaining a strong console-based ecosystem supported by globally renowned intellectual properties. South Korea stands out in online PC gaming and esports, combining hyper-realistic visuals with hybrid genre narratives that appeal to global audiences. Despite embracing free-to-play models, each market exhibits unique approaches to content creation, distribution, and user engagement, reflecting deeper cultural and industrial philosophies. The analysis highlights the interconnected yet distinct developmental models, offering insights into the future trajectory of digital entertainment and cultural soft power in the global gaming landscape.
Downloads
References
[1] Gamma Data. 2023 China Game Industry Report[R]. Beijing: Gamma Data, 2023.
[2] Famitsu. 2023 White Paper on the Japanese Game Market[R]. Tokyo: Famitsu, 2023.
[3] Korea Creative Content Agency (KOCCA). 2023 White Paper on the Korean Game Industry[R]. Seoul: KOCCA, 2023.
[4] Japan Esports Union (JESU). 2023 Report on the Japanese Esports Industry[R]. Tokyo: JESU, 2023.
[5] Newzoo. Global Games Market Report[R]. Amsterdam: Newzoo, 2023.
[6] Coe N M, Yang C. Mobile gaming production networks, platform business groups, and the market power of China’s Tencent[J]. Annals of the American Association of Geographers, 2022, 112(2): 307-330. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/24694452.2021.1933887
[7] Fung A Y H. Online games and Chinese national identities[M]//Cultural policies in East Asia: Dynamics between the state, arts and creative industries. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, 2014: 53-68. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137327772_4
[8] Chew M M. A critical cultural history of online games in China, 1995–2015[J]. Games and Culture, 2019, 14(3): 195-215. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1555412016661457
[9] Wada T. History of Japanese role-playing games[J]. Annals of Business Administrative Science, 2017, 16(3): 137-147. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7880/abas.0170228a
[10] Yoon T J, Cheon H. Game playing as transnational cultural practice: A case study of Chinese gamers and Korean MMORPGs[J]. International Journal of Cultural Studies, 2014, 17(5): 469-483. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1367877913505172
[11] Lam G, Kuen Wong O W. Cross-country comparison of the esports industry in China, South Korea and Japan[J]. Sport in Society, 2024: 1-26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17430437.2024.2424559
[12] Hong F, Zhouxiang L. The Routledge handbook of sport in Asia[M]. London: Routledge, 2020 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429061202
[13] Jisun C. Creative industries and global co-development: Lessons from the first successful case in Korean online games[J]. Creative Industries Journal, 2010, 3(2): 125-136. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1386/cij.3.2.125_1
[14] Aoyama Y, Izushi H. Hardware gimmick or cultural innovation? Technological, cultural, and social foundations of the Japanese video game industry[J]. Research policy, 2003, 32(3): 423-444. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00016-1
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Highlights in Business, Economics and Management
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
