Research On the Amplification Effect of New Media on Capital Public Opinion Within the Framework of Communication Studies
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54097/6jnbde06Keywords:
New Media; Capital Public Opinion; Amplification Effect; Communication Mechanism; Governance Path.Abstract
In the digital age, the number of social media users has exceeded one billion, and the average daily usage time of short-video platforms exceeds two hours. New media has become the core stage for shaping and disseminating public opinion. Capital has actively intervened in this field, deeply integrating through mergers and acquisitions and investments, greatly amplifying the narrative driven by capital. The continuous evolution of media technology, coupled with the increasing penetration of capital, has driven this effect. Driven by algorithmic recommendations, a wide multi-agent communication network, and carefully designed content, this amplification effect influences the capital market, public opinion dynamics, and social governance at multiple levels. This article draws on the research achievements of communication studies to explore the connection between the expansion of new media and capital-related discourse, analyzes the amplification mechanisms at the technical, communication, and content levels, summarizes its various impacts, and proposes governance strategies related to regulation, the media ecosystem, and public literacy. The aim is to provide a theoretical perspective for understanding the operation mechanism of public opinion under the influence of capital and optimizing the media environment.
Downloads
References
[1] Kaplan AM, Haenlein M. Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of social media. Business Horizons. 2010. Jan;53(1):59–68.
[2] Ball-Rokeach SJ, DeFleur ML. A dependency model of mass-media effects. Communication Research. 1976. Jan;3(1):3–21.
[3] Yan Q. Duality: the influence of selective exposure on the differences of political opinion expression among young netizens. Journalism Research. 2020;(9):56–78+121.
[4] Zhu W, Zheng D, Wang, Zhou H. A comparative study of WeChat and Weibo from the perspective of social capital: a case study of university population. Journal of Intelligence. 2014;33(6):138–143.
[5] Gelfand MJ, Spurlock D, Sniezek JA, Shao L. Culture and social prediction: the role of information in enhancing confidence in social predictions in the United States and China. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology. 2000. Jul;31(4):498–516.
[6] Deluca KM, Brunner E, Sun Y. Weibo, WeChat, and the transformative events of environmental activism on China’s wild public screens. International Journal of Communication. 2016. Jan;10.
[7] Barbalet JM. Social emotions: confidence, trust and loyalty. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy. 1996. Sep 1;16(9/10):75–96.
[8] Shuang C. Break the dichotomy of thinking and promote the development of deep integration—Accurately grasp the relationship between political attributes and communication attributes of mainstream media. News and Writing. 2022;(7):105–110.
[9] Pan X, Luo Y. Exploring the multidimensional relationships between social media support, social confidence, perceived media credibility and life attitude during the COVID-19 pandemic. Current Psychology. 2022. Jun;41(6):3388–3400.
[10] Bi W, Chu Q. How does income affect social confidence? —Base on the indirect role of the sense of social equity. Journal of Xi’an Jiaotong University (Social Sciences). 2017;37(3):44–50.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Highlights in Business, Economics and Management

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.







