Exploring Macro Factor-Driven Multi-Asset Tactical Allocation Strategies with Machine Learning
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54097/jyc7pm15Keywords:
Tactical Asset Allocation; Macro Factor; Machine Learning; Ridge Regression; Mean-Variance Optimization.Abstract
This study constructs a machine learning-based tactical asset allocation (TAA) framework to address the limitations of traditional strategic asset allocation (SAA) in a volatile macro environment. The study obtains macroeconomic indicators from FRED and combines Exchange Traded Fund (ETF) historical data with lagged and rolling standardization methods to avoid forward-looking bias. In this paper, ridge regression, random forest, and XGBoost prediction models are compared, and a model selection mechanism based on prediction accuracy is proposed. The results show that ridge regression is the most robust in terms of forecasting accuracy and directional consistency. Based on the forecast signal, two types of portfolio strategies are designed: the Top-N equal-weight strategy and the mean-variance optimization strategy. The empirical results show that the mean-variance optimization strategy outperforms the 60/40 benchmark portfolio in terms of risk-return performance: its annualized return rate is 15.86%, slightly higher than 15.73% of the 60/40 benchmark portfolio; The Sharpe ratio reached 1.564, up about 16.9% from 1.338 of 60/40; Volatility also decreased from 11.75% to 10.14%, significantly improving risk control. These findings verify the potential of machine learning-driven asset rotation, provide practical reference for investors and asset managers, and lay a methodological foundation for future research introducing more factors, more complex models, and cross-market validation.
Downloads
References
[1] International Monetary Fund. Global Financial Stability Report. 2024.
[2] Cooper I, Mitrache A, Priestley R. A global macroeconomic risk model for value, momentum, and other asset classes. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 2022, 57(1): 1–30.
[3] Markowitz H M. Portfolio selection. The Journal of Finance, 1952, 7(1): 77–91.
[4] Katongo M, Bhattacharyya R. The use of deep reinforcement learning in tactical asset allocation. SSRN Preprint, 2021, Paper No. 3812609.
[5] Bryzgalova S, DeMiguel V, Li S, Pelger M. Asset-pricing factors with economic targets. SSRN Preprint, 2023, Paper No. 4344837.
[6] Zhang Z, Zohren S, Roberts S. Deep learning for portfolio optimization. arXiv preprint arXiv:2005.13665, 2020.
[7] Chen L, Pelger M, Zhu J. Deep learning in asset pricing. Management Science, 2024, 70(2): 714–750.
[8] Yahoo Finance. SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust (SPY), iShares MSCI Australia ETF (EWA), SPDR Dow Jones Industrial Average ETF (DIA), Invesco QQQ Trust (QQQ), SPDR Gold Shares (GLD), and iShares MSCI EAFE ETF (EFA). Yahoo Finance, https://finance.yahoo.com accessed 2025-08-21.
[9] Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis. Federal Reserve Economic Data (FRED): T10Y2Y, CPIAUCSL, VIXCLS, UNRATE, INDPRO, FEDFUNDS, BAA10Y, DGS10, SP500, DTWEXBGS, INFLATION, REAL_RATE, and SP500_RETURN. FRED Database, https://fred.stlouisfed.org accessed 2025-08-21.
[10] Huang Y, Luk P. Measuring economic policy uncertainty in China. China Economic Review, 2020, 59: 101367.
[11] Rao G, Lu T, Yan L, Liu Y. A hybrid LSTM-KNN framework for detecting market microstructure anomalies: Evidence from high-frequency jump behaviors in credit default swap markets. Journal of Knowledge Learning and Science Technology, 2024, 3(4): 361–371.
[12] Jaimungal S, Pesenti S M, Wang Y S, Tatsat H. Robust risk-aware reinforcement learning. SIAM Journal on Financial Mathematics, 2022, 13(1): 213–226.
[13] Paramesha M, Rane N, Rane J. Artificial intelligence, machine learning, deep learning, and blockchain in financial and banking services: A comprehensive review. Machine Learning, Deep Learning, and Blockchain in Financial and Banking Services: A Comprehensive Review, 2024.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Highlights in Business, Economics and Management

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.







