Support Or Barrier? The Impacts of Social Capital Stock on Low-Income Family in Shenzhen

Authors

  • Yourong Zhang School of Social Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/qs21af85

Keywords:

Social capital; low-income households; inequality; intergenerational poverty.

Abstract

In contemporary society, low-income households frequently face barriers in accessing education, healthcare, or stable employment, with social relationships exerting complex influences on their situation. This paper centres on the core issue of how social capital endowment affects low-income households, analysing both its supportive functions and detrimental effects. This research employs a social capital theoretical framework and literature review methodology, selecting Shenzhen in Guangdong province, China as the case study. By reviewing classical theories, recent empirical research, and public policy, this study reveals in depth the functional role of social capital endowment for low-income households. Specifically, social capital can promote children's education, provide employment opportunities, ensure daily care, and offer microloans. Simultaneously, it creates exclusivity, solidifies entrenched interests, and perpetuates intergenerational poverty. The specific impacts depend on how open the social networks are, whether trust extends beyond consanguinity, and whether reciprocity scales from the household to the community and institutions. Policy that widens bridging and linking ties, and reduces economic or status-based advantages, can turn social capital from a barrier into a support. The paper adds a city-level view of how social capital interacts with institutions. It helps design fairer policies of education, housing, and welfare systems that guide positive social capital and limit harms.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Shenzhen Municipal Bureau of Civil Affairs. Notice of the Shenzhen municipal bureau of civil affairs on issuing the 2025 standards for minimum living allowance and other social assistance. June 17, 2025. Retrieved on September 24, 2025. Retrieved from: https://www.szlhq.gov.cn/lhmzjrlzyj/gkmlpt/content/12/12231/post_12231676.html#14017.

[2] Bao’an District Education Bureau. Guidelines on admission of new students to compulsory education in bao’an district for the autumn semester of 2025. June 5, 2025. Retrieved on September 24, 2025. Retrieved from: https://www.sz.gov.cn/school/tzgg/content/post_12213754.html.

[3] Hong Zhichao, Zhang Miao. The impact of family capital on educational quality and its mechanism: an empirical study based on ceps survey data. Finance and Economics, 2021, (09): 90-96.

[4] Xu Lijie. Analysis of intergenerational transmission of poverty based on social capital theory. International Public Relations, 2020, (11): 174-175.

[5] Jiang Qiuchuan, Ren Jie. Inequality in educational opportunities: new evidence from the China education panel survey. Nankai Economic Research, 2020, (04): 165-184.

[6] Liu Yangyang, Wang Rui. Can the underprivileged produce elite offspring? An empirical study based on the ‘household wealth-educational investment-wealth gap’ framework. Southern China Economic Journal, 2017, (02): 40-61.

[7] Zhang Wenhong, Su Di. Cultural capital, economic capital and class reproduction. Jianghai Academic Journal, 2018, (03): 102-112.

[8] Bourdieu P. The Forms of Capital. In J. Richardson (Eds.) Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education. New York: Greenwood, 1986: 241-258.

[9] Coleman J. Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 1988, 94(1): 95-120.

[10] Putnam R. D. Making democracy work: civic traditions in modern Italy. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1993.

[11] Putnam R. D. Bowling alone: the collapse and revival of american community. New York: Touchstone Books/Simon & Schuster, 2000.

[12] Szreter S, Woolcock M. Health by association? Social capital, social theory, and the political economy of public health. International Journal of Epidemiology, 2004, 33(4): 650-667.

[13] Wu Yanhua, Huang Yunling, Xu Yanhui. Measuring urban social cohesion: data and analysis from the Shenzhen social quality survey. Guangdong Social Sciences, 2013, (02): 210-219.

[14] Wang Hui, Zhu Lin. Analysis of the proportion, characteristics and influencing factors of low-income groups in China: an empirical study based on the china household panel survey data. Journal of Chengdu University of Technology (Social Sciences Edition), 2023, 31(03): 42-57.

[15] Lenkewitz S, Wittek M. Social networks and educational decisions: who has access to social capital and for whom is it beneficial? KZfSS Kölner Zeitschrift Für Soziologie Und Sozialpsychologie, 2022, 74(4): 437-472.

[16] Portes A. Social capital: its origins and applications in modern sociology. Annual Review of Sociology, 1998, 24(1): 1-24.

[17] Fine B. Social capital versus social theory. London: Routledge, 2002.

[18] Hovestadt T, Lorenz G. Social network effects on educational inequality: the role of similarity bias in social influence. Research in Social Stratification and Mobility, 2025, 98(06): 101071.

Downloads

Published

27-12-2025

How to Cite

Zhang , Y. (2025). Support Or Barrier? The Impacts of Social Capital Stock on Low-Income Family in Shenzhen. Highlights in Business, Economics and Management, 65, 239-245. https://doi.org/10.54097/qs21af85